Literature-ification
A few days ago, one of my students, Susan, a girl whose enthusiasm is match only by her capacity for messy writing, asked me during class if I thought life was like theater and theater like life. I was a bit taken aback to get a question like this from one of my grade ones, but it was a good reminder that these kids are really smart and that so often my perception of them is colored by the fact that their language skills simply lack far behind their reasoning abilities. This has proved a real challenge in some of our debates and discussions and is certainly something I've felt in my study of Chinese; a 24-year old mind expressing itself in a 10-year old's vocabulary. But, to get back to the original story, I answered simply that I thought it was certainly true in some ways, but that the comparison wasn't perfect. After class though it got me thinking about this relationship and I wondered if occasionally writing about my life had made me think of things in a literary way. Events become stories to be told with a beginning, middle and an end, and the people in my life becoming the characters who drive those stories. But something I struggled to find the words to describe to Susan is that I think such a comparison results in a oversimplfication, by nature of the genre. Literature is both powered and limited by the fact that the author must make choices about what to include. While it enables the writer to illuminate a particular point or develop their theme of choice, you cannot describe every leaf of every tree nor can you construct a literary relationship to match the complexities of its real life counterpart. So, the questions for today are which parts of you would form your character? Which events define you? What role would you play?